The origin of high
heels
For generations
they have signified femininity and glamour - but a pair of high heels was once
an essential accessory for men.
Beautiful,
provocative, sexy - high heels may be all these things and more, but even their
most ardent fans wouldn't claim they were practical.
"The high heel
was worn for centuries throughout the near east as a form of riding
footwear," says Elizabeth Semmelhack of the Bata Shoe Museum in Toronto.
Good horsemanship
was essential to the fighting styles of the Persia - the historical name for
modern-day Iran.
"When the
soldier stood up in his stirrups, the heel helped him to secure his stance so
that he could shoot his bow and arrow more effectively," says Semmelhack.
At the end of the
16th Century, Persia's Shah Abbas I had the largest cavalry in the world. He
was keen to forge links with rulers in Western Europe to help him defeat his
great enemy, the Ottoman Empire.
So in 1599, Abbas
sent the first Persian diplomatic mission to Europe - it called on the courts
of Russia, Germany and Spain.
A wave of interest
in all things Persian passed through Western Europe. Persian style shoes were
enthusiastically adopted by aristocrats, who sought to give their appearance a
virile, masculine edge that, it suddenly seemed, only heeled shoes could
supply.
As the wearing of
heels filtered into the lower ranks of society, the aristocracy responded by
dramatically increasing the height of their shoes - and the high heel was born.
In the muddy,
rutted streets of 17th Century Europe, these new shoes had no utility value
whatsoever - but that was the point.
"One of the
best ways that status can be conveyed is through impracticality," says
Semmelhack, adding that the upper classes have always used impractical,
uncomfortable and luxurious clothing to announce their privileged status.
"They aren't
in the fields working and they don't have to walk far."
When it comes to
history's most notable shoe collectors, the Imelda Marcos of his day was
arguably Louis XIV of France. For a great king, he was rather diminutively
proportioned at only 5ft 4in (1.63m).
He supplemented his
stature by a further 4in (10cm) with heels, often elaborately decorated with
depictions of battle scenes.
The heels and soles
were always red - the dye was expensive and carried a martial overtone. The
fashion soon spread overseas - Charles II of England's coronation portrait of
1661 features him wearing a pair of enormous red, French style heels - although
he was over 6ft (1.85m) to begin with.
In the 1670s, Louis
XIV issued an edict that only members of his court were allowed to wear red
heels. In theory, all anyone in French society had to do to check whether
someone was in favour with the king was to glance downwards. In practice,
unauthorised, imitation heels were available.
While today's fashion designers
have a huge array of plastics and metals in their toolbox, it was an
engineering challenge for 17th Century shoemakers to support the instep on a
high heel
- One solution was to place the heel very far
forward in the shoe - this effectively transferred the problem from the
shoemaker to the wearer
Although Europeans
were first attracted to heels because the Persian connection gave them a macho
air, a craze in women's fashion for adopting elements of men's dress meant
their use soon spread to women and children.
"In the 1630s
you had women cutting their hair, adding epaulettes to their outfits,"
says Semmelhack.
"They would
smoke pipes, they would wear hats that were very masculine. And this is why
women adopted the heel - it was in an effort to masculinise their
outfits."
From that time,
Europe's upper classes followed a unisex shoe fashion until the end of the 17th
Century, when things began to change again.
"You start
seeing a change in the heel at this point," says Helen Person, a curator
at the Victoria and Albert Museum in London. "Men started to have a
squarer, more robust, lower, stacky heel, while women's heels became more
slender, more curvaceous."
Association Elizabeth Semmelhack believes that high heels began to be seen as erotic
footwear when they came back into fashion in the late 19th Century - the nude
models on French postcards were often wearing them
Biology Dr Helen Fischer, a biological anthropologist at Rutgers University,
says that heels force women into a "natural courting pose" found
amongst mammals, with an arched back and protruding buttocks
“Well, my buttocks protrudes, so I guess I must be a hotty? Ha.
Men must have looked ridiculous? I don’t think I could find
a man in high heels attractive.
A skirt perhaps? Hahaha.
The offal truth about American haggis
Traditional
Scottish haggis is banned in the United States. With Burns Night looming, how
do fans satisfy their taste for oatmeal and offal?
For aficionados, it
is the "great chieftain o' the pudding-race".
To sceptics,
however, it is a gruesome mush of sheep's innards - and for decades American
authorities have agreed.
Authentic Scottish
haggis has been banned in the United States since 1971, when the US Department
of Agriculture (USDA) first took a dim view of one of its key ingredients -
sheep's lung.
While millions of
people around the world will enjoy, or endure, a Burns Night helping on 25
January, those in the US who want to celebrate Scotland's national bard in the
traditional manner are compelled to improvise.
We're lucky if some
of them take more than a mouthful”
End Quote Haggis fan Jim Short in LaGrange, Georgia
Some choose to
stage offal-free Burns suppers, and for most people not raised in Scotland, the
absence of the dish - comprising sheep's "pluck" (heart, liver and
lungs) minced with onion, oatmeal, suet and spices, all soaked in stock and
then boiled in either a sausage casing or a sheep's stomach - might be no great
hardship.
But for many expat
Scots and Scots-Americans, the notion of Burns Supper without haggis is as
unthinkable as Thanksgiving without turkey.
According to
custom, the haggis should be paraded into the room with a bagpiper before
Robert Burns' poem Address to a Haggis is recited and the dish is served as the
main course.
Fair fa' your honest, sonsie face,
Great chieftain o' the pudding-race! Aboon them a' ye tak your place, Painch,
tripe, or thairm: Weel are ye wordy o'a grace As lang's my arm
|
Even when I ate meat, I no way could even put that on a
fork.
Sorry my Scottish friends, I love Scotland, but not the
above. Give me Yorkshire puddings any day?
No comments:
Post a Comment